Switching from Heroku to Render: Top 10 Reasons Explained
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction
If you're looking to set up a straightforward website or online service using technologies like NodeJS, Ruby, Python, or Java, you might be familiar with AWS products. However, for many, AWS can be overly complex, especially if your user base is substantial.
Typically, developers turn to Heroku due to its user-friendly setup and seamless integration with GitHub, allowing code to automatically deploy with a pull request to the primary branch. Heroku offers simplicity and ease of scaling when necessary. But if Heroku is so straightforward, why consider other options?
Enter Render, a newer hosting platform launched in April 2019 that aims to provide a powerful yet accessible hosting solution. Here are ten compelling reasons why I made the switch from Heroku to Render.
Section 1.1: Stunning User Interface and Experience
In the realm of developer tools, the significance of user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) is often underestimated. While functionality is crucial, a well-designed UI/UX can greatly enhance your willingness to use a platform.
AWS, despite its advanced capabilities, suffers from a clunky interface. Heroku, while more user-friendly, still pales in comparison to Render, which boasts an aesthetically pleasing UI and a remarkable UX. Setting up any application takes only a couple of minutes, with well-defined padding around buttons and sections that makes navigation easy.
Section 1.2: Handling HTTP Request Timeouts
Some applications require extended periods to generate responses. For instance, when developing a web scraping tool, the process of gathering data from multiple search engines can take several minutes.
Heroku imposes a strict response timeout of 30 seconds, closing connections if the server doesn't respond in time—this limitation cannot be adjusted, even with paid dynos. In contrast, Render allows for a generous timeout of up to 100 minutes, making it a far more accommodating option for lengthy processes.
Chapter 2: Data Persistence and Hosting Flexibility
The first video explores the transition from Heroku to Render, detailing the deployment of a full-stack NodeJS application.
Persistent data is another significant concern for developers. When using Heroku, deployments can wipe data, leaving no trace of saved files or caches. This means that every redeployment results in data loss.
Render, however, permits data to persist between deployments, allowing you to maintain important files and databases like MongoDB or MySQL without relying on third-party services. This integration simplifies development and enhances performance by keeping network calls internal.
Section 2.1: Flexible Application Building
Heroku enforces strict guidelines on how applications should be structured. For example, when deploying a NodeJS app, you are required to include an npm build script, which can be unnecessary for pure JavaScript servers.
Render, on the other hand, offers the freedom to build applications in various ways—whether through shell scripts, JavaScript files, or without any build process at all.
The second video provides insights into deploying a Node.js Puppeteer app on Render.com at no cost.
Section 2.2: Enhanced Security and Load Management
Heroku lags behind in terms of modern transfer protocols, only supporting HTTP/1.1. Render serves content over HTTP/2 and is transitioning to HTTP/3, which offers enhanced speed and security. Additionally, HTTPS is automatically configured for all Render sites, eliminating the hassle of setup.
When it comes to DDoS protection, Heroku's measures are basic at best. In contrast, Render employs advanced DDoS protection through Cloudflare, safeguarding all hosted sites without requiring user intervention.
Chapter 3: Scalability and Continuous Availability
Load balancing is essential for applications experiencing increased traffic. Heroku complicates the setup process, while Render seamlessly integrates load balancing, allowing your application to scale effortlessly.
Moreover, maintaining zero downtime is crucial for user experience. Unlike Heroku, which restarts servers every 24 hours, Render ensures that your application remains operational unless you decide to shut it down manually.
Section 3.1: Automatic Health Monitoring
Heroku lacks built-in health checks, which can be detrimental for any hosting service. Render allows you to set custom paths for health checks, automatically restarting your application if it fails to respond correctly.
Section 3.2: Cost Efficiency
Both Heroku and Render offer free plans for hosting applications. However, as you scale, Heroku's pricing can skyrocket—potentially exceeding $10,000 monthly for significant traffic.
In conclusion, transitioning from Heroku to Render offers developers a more flexible, efficient, and cost-effective solution for their hosting needs. With its superior UI/UX, data persistence, and advanced security features, Render stands out as a formidable alternative to traditional hosting platforms.