Unlocking the Secrets of Interchange Revenue in FinTech
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Interchange Revenue
Interchange revenue, an essential yet often overlooked aspect, plays a pivotal role in enabling fintech neobanks to effectively compete with traditional banks. This revenue stream arises from card transactions, which have become the preferred payment method for both consumers and businesses alike.
As people increasingly opt for card payments—be it credit, debit, or prepaid—especially during the recent surge in eCommerce, merchants bear the cost through interchange processing fees deducted from the total purchase. These fees are distributed among the card-issuing bank, card network associations (like Visa and Mastercard), and merchant processors, providing a revenue source for all parties involved. This system ensures merchants receive payment, covers fraud protection costs, and enhances the overall purchasing experience for customers. The increase in sales from accepting card payments far outweighs the transaction fees incurred.
For financial institutions, including neobanks and challenger banks, interchange fees represent a significant revenue source. Platforms that issue cards, such as Marqeta, rely heavily on this income. The specific amounts can vary based on card type, transaction category, and other factors, with regulations such as the Durbin Act in the U.S. influencing how much issuing banks receive.
Next, let's delve into the history, influencing factors, and processes involved in card transaction approvals and settlements.
Chapter 2: A Brief History of Interchange Fees
The concept of interchange fees originated in the 1970s, following the launch of the first credit card by Bank of America in the 1950s. This innovation led to the establishment of payment networks, such as Visa and MasterCard. Initially, interchange fees were implemented to cover processing and credit risk costs, with various companies, including Discover and American Express, entering the market and charging their own fees.
For ATM withdrawals, the issuing bank pays an interchange fee to the acquiring bank that dispenses the cash. In today’s neobank landscape, partnership agreements with licensed banks determine the interchange revenue distribution, which can either be volume-based or a fixed percentage split.
The card networks establish interchange rates, typically between 1% and 3% of the transaction amount, and they are reviewed annually to stay competitive. During the pandemic, merchants resisted proposed fee increases due to declining transaction volumes, leading to postponed adjustments.
Chapter 3: Factors Influencing Interchange Fees
Several factors contribute to the interchange fees charged at the transaction level:
- Card Network: Each network has its own fee structure, typically maintaining competitive rates.
- Cardholder Type: Fees differ for consumer versus commercial cards, with commercial cards generally incurring higher rates.
- Merchant Type: Fees can vary based on the business category, with higher-risk transactions often attracting higher fees.
- Business Volume: High-volume merchants may negotiate lower fees, while new businesses often accept standard rates.
- Transaction Type: In-person transactions generally incur lower fees due to reduced risk, whereas eCommerce transactions have higher rates.
The Durbin Amendment places limits on debit card processing fees for large banks, providing community banks with an advantage in earning higher interchange revenue.
Chapter 4: The Card Transaction Process
The process of a card transaction involves several steps:
- Authorization: A cardholder swipes their card at a merchant’s point-of-sale terminal. The terminal sends a payment request to a processor, which connects with the card network to verify the card's status and available funds.
- Batching & Clearing: At the end of the day, the merchant processes a batch of transactions, which the processor sends to the card network for clearing with the issuing banks.
- Funding: After clearing, funds are transferred from the issuing bank to the merchant, minus interchange fees.
This framework has remained largely unchanged for decades, benefiting card networks and issuing banks with stable revenue.
Chapter 5: FinTechs and Interchange Revenue
As fintech companies began to emerge over a decade ago, they focused on minimizing fees to attract users. However, as fee income became limited, interchange revenue from card programs became their primary revenue stream.
For example, on a $100 purchase, interchange fees vary widely across categories, with gas stations typically charged lower rates compared to restaurants or online purchases. Understanding user spending patterns is vital for projecting revenue in these capped categories.
Fintechs, particularly neobanks, often partner with smaller banks to maximize their interchange revenue share, capturing up to 90% of the interchange income from user spending.
Chapter 6: Challenges in the Card Payment Landscape
Fraud detection remains a significant challenge for all stakeholders in the card payment ecosystem. The increasing rates of data breaches and compromised information necessitate higher interchange fees to cover associated costs.
Merchant associations advocate for stable interchange costs and regulatory measures to prevent frequent fee increases. As competition grows, both card networks and fintechs are exploring alternatives, including cryptocurrency and lower-cost payment solutions, to enhance their offerings and maintain customer loyalty.
In 2022 and beyond, the focus is shifting toward comprehensive banking services that address more aspects of a customer's financial life, integrating credit products with existing accounts.
Interchange revenue will continue to be a crucial element of fintech monetization strategies, particularly in the early stages of market presence.
Join our community @FinTechtris for more insights and in-depth analyses in the fintech sector. Sign up for our newsletter today!