Chapter 1: The Hidden World of Underground Bases

In December 1982, a U.S. Air Force tunnel boring machine was spotted at Little Skull Mountain in Nevada. This sighting has fueled numerous claims about the existence of concealed military tunnels throughout the United States.

The tunnel boring machine (TBM) showcased here is valued at $13 million and operates at the Nevada Test Site, which includes the infamous Area 51. Various governmental bodies utilize different types of TBMs, including "nuclear-powered TBMs" (NTBMs) that can melt solid rock, leaving behind a smooth glass-like finish.

The majority of tunneling operations occur within military environments where information is closely guarded. Notable locations like Area 51 and Lockheed's facility in California are rumored to host extensive underground networks, with insights from former employees hinting at their operations over the years.

Funding for these initiatives is substantial, with the "black budget" estimated at $1.25 trillion each year. A portion of these funds is allocated to deep underground military bases (DUMBs), with around 129 believed to exist in the U.S. These underground complexes have been constructed since the early 1940s, supported by cutting-edge technology.

DUMBs can be immense, some reaching depths of over a mile and housing entire underground cities. They employ laser boring machines capable of drilling tunnels up to seven miles in length within a single day, featuring rapid magneto-leviton trains for swift transportation between facilities.

Phil Schneider, an advocate for transparency regarding these underground projects, pointed out that advanced tunneling machines can cut through rock at remarkable speeds. These machines use high-energy impact lasers, minimizing debris and allowing for the creation of a maglev train network that links DUMBs.

The rush to develop these facilities is often attributed to anticipated disasters. A significant portion of the funding for these projects is rumored to stem from illegal drug sales, with proceeds funneled into DUMB operations.

Nuclear tunneling technology, pioneered at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, utilizes compact atomic reactors to melt rock and soil, crafting glass-lined tunnels. This approach has advantages over traditional tunneling methods, such as reducing waste and lessening environmental impact.

Patents for this nuclear tunneling technology were filed in the 1970s, suggesting its potential use in covert tunneling operations. The lack of conventional debris associated with mechanical tunneling makes it difficult to detect these underground facilities, further deepening the enigma surrounding their existence.

Section 1.1: Innovations in Tunneling Technology

Presented here is a tunneling machine designed to operate without generating waste, creating a smooth, glass-like tunnel lining.

Three years later, another patent was issued for a machine designed to excavate large tunnels in various soil types. This innovative device simultaneously breaks out the tunnel core by thermally melting a boundary cut while forming a supporting lining of molten materials. The heat required for this process is supplied by a compact nuclear reactor.

The 1975 patent indicates that this machine can create tunnels exceeding 12 meters (over 40 feet) in diameter, melting a circular boundary in front of the tunnel while simultaneously forming a solid, glassy tunnel lining.

Remarkably, just 21 days later, the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration secured a third patent for a similar tunneling device. This machine also utilizes a compact nuclear reactor to detach the tunnel core, allowing for the construction of tunnels with a minimum diameter of 40 feet and a glass interior.

These patents, owned by U.S. governmental bodies, have led to speculation about the creation of deep, secret tunnels with glass walls, as mentioned in UFO literature. The fact that most of the inventors hail from Los Alamos, New Mexico, adds to the intrigue, as that facility has been surrounded by rumors of underground activities.

A 1973 study from Los Alamos titled "Systems and Cost Analysis for a Nuclear Underground Tunneling Machine: A Preliminary Study" suggests that Nuclear Underground Tunneling Machines (NSTMs) could be more cost-effective than traditional Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs). This study indicates potential cost savings and favorable benefit-cost ratios, making NSTMs a viable option, especially in challenging ground conditions.

Chapter 2: The Economic Viability of NSTMs

This video, "How to Build a Modern Secret Underground Base," delves into the methods and technologies employed in constructing these concealed facilities.

Additionally, in "Minecraft: Secret Underground Base Tutorial," viewers can learn how to create their own underground structures, echoing the themes of secrecy and innovation explored in real-world tunneling technology.

In 1974, A.A. Mathews conducted a detailed cost analysis for constructing three tunnels of varying diameters in Southern California, revealing insightful comparisons between NSTMs and traditional TBMs.

The findings indicated that utilizing NSTMs could result in a 12% cost savings for a 15.5-foot tunnel and a 6% savings for a 20.5-foot tunnel, though a 30% cost penalty was observed for the 10-foot tunnel.

The cost-effectiveness of NSTMs is attributed to two main factors: (a) NSTMs operate as a capital-intensive system rather than a labor-intensive one, and (b) NSTMs allow for the simultaneous construction of initial support structures while excavating.

This analysis underscores the government's careful consideration of the operational costs associated with underground nuclear facilities, emphasizing the economic advantages of NSTMs for tunnels ranging from 15 to 20 feet in diameter.

Moreover, the choice of a challenging location in Southern California for the tunnel cost analysis adds to the intrigue, as the region has long been associated with rumors of secret tunnel systems. Could Mathews' study have been a precursor to a covert tunnel project, particularly given the cost advantages of NSTMs over conventional TBMs?

As of now, the question remains unanswered: Have nuclear tunneling machines been or are they currently being employed for underground tunnel construction?